3 ms·
Yes, that is exactly the part that concerns me. This doesn't need more code, it needs desperately less.
by stefan_ 5y ago
Yes, that is exactly the part that concerns me. This doesn't need more code, it needs desperately less.
- yashap 5y agoI’m with you, but if you’re maintaining a massively popular open source library, where backwards compatibility is expected, you’re not going to remove features without careful consideration. For an important bug fix, it probably does make more sense to just fix it without breaking anything first, then talk about a more careful deprecation/removal plan.