3 ms·

You assume that people stay the same. Who knows what happened to Satoshi(psychologically) after he left in 2010. Situation was pretty stressful at the time; Wik

You assume that people stay the same. Who knows what happened to Satoshi(psychologically) after he left in 2010. Situation was pretty stressful at the time; WikiLeaks starts using Bitcoin, Gavin emails Satoshi that he is visiting CIA, SilkRoad(dark web drug store) is about to become a synonym for Bitcoin. Things were unfolding quite the opposite from what was envisioned in the whitepaper. But I think Satoshi must be from British English speaking area because he used "bloody" word and he hardcoded The Times cover in the genesis block. He could've faked all this but I don't think that's the case because he was pretty consistent(comments in Bitcoin source code, mailing list, whitepaper, forum posts etc.) I'm still waiting for Craig to upload bank statement of him purchasing bitcoin.org domain that he said he has or his bank has. Bitcoin.org domain purchase would be solid proof towards him proving that he is indeed Satoshi or that he was a member or perhaps the leader of the group.

nullc 5y ago
> You assume that people stay the same. What statement did I make which suggested that? Just that I pointed out that his current statements starkly contradict Satoshi's statements about the nature and purpose of Bitcoin? > he used "bloody" word A quick search of my email showed I used it half dozen times in the mid 2000s and I am not british English speaking. > He could've faked all this but I don't think that's the case because he was pretty consistent So his name must actually be "Satashi Nakamoto" then, since he was most consistent in using that of all? :) > I'm still waiting for Craig to upload bank statement In the kleiman trial Wright was caught forging many statements/invoices/purchase orders. Why would you expect to find anything except another forgery? ... and why would you be waiting? Wright has already given extraordinarily strong disproof: When ordered by the court to list his bitcoin holdings and the list appeared in the docket, the actual owner(s) of thousands of coins from it showed up and produced digital signatures attesting that the coins weren't wright's ( https://cswarchive.info/csw-filed#145-Signings https://cswarchive.info/csw-filed#145-Signings ). So why hold your breath for easily forged evidence of a kind he's already been caught forging when there is unforgable evidence the guts the heart of his claims?

nullc 5y ago

> You assume that people stay the same. What statement did I make which suggested that? Just that I pointed out that his current statements starkly contradict Satoshi's statements about the nature and purpose of Bitcoin? > he used "bloody" word A quick search of my email showed I used it half dozen times in the mid 2000s and I am not british English speaking. > He could've faked all this but I don't think that's the case because he was pretty consistent So his name must actually be "Satashi Nakamoto" then, since he was most consistent in using that of all? :) > I'm still waiting for Craig to upload bank statement In the kleiman trial Wright was caught forging many statements/invoices/purchase orders. Why would you expect to find anything except another forgery? ... and why would you be waiting? Wright has already given extraordinarily strong disproof: When ordered by the court to list his bitcoin holdings and the list appeared in the docket, the actual owner(s) of thousands of coins from it showed up and produced digital signatures attesting that the coins weren't wright's ( https://cswarchive.info/csw-filed#145-Signings https://cswarchive.info/csw-filed#145-Signings ). So why hold your breath for easily forged evidence of a kind he's already been caught forging when there is unforgable evidence the guts the heart of his claims?