It's a bit unclear from the article whether the woman is a channel moderator I only corrected the claim that moderators have any administrative privileges, unr

It's a bit unclear from the article whether the woman is a channel moderator I only corrected the claim that moderators have any administrative privileges, unrelated to the case at hand. If we consider that Anonymous is an organisation Except it isn't, that was my point. Anonymous is more akin to something like a subculture. Do we prosecute everyone who considers himself, for example, a Punk, just because some other members of the Punk movement have done questionable things? and people who are better informed than us. And that is the problem. No one of the people who make decisions in these cases even understand Anonymous, how are they supposed to be "better informed" than us?