3 ms·
You literally wrote "There is widespread use of non judicial punishments by police officers." and "People engaged in constitutionally protected activities are o
by rednerrus 5y ago
You literally wrote "There is widespread use of non judicial punishments by police officers." and "People engaged in constitutionally protected activities are often subjected to intimidation and brutality with no recourse." Forgive me if I assumed the second statement was in regards to the police and that isn't what you meant.
Do you have evidence for either of those statements?
Increased domestic violence may very well lead to increased violence at work. You haven't presented any evidence to indicate that.
- syki 5y agoYou previously wrote: Are you asserting that domestic violence is "non judicial punishments" or that it's violating the general populations right to peaceable assembly? Now you write: You literally wrote "There is widespread use of non judicial punishments by police officers." and "People engaged in constitutionally protected activities are often subjected to intimidation and brutality with no recourse." Forgive me if I assumed the second statement was in regards to the police and that isn't what you meant. Obviously these two statements I wrote have to do with police and violence they perpetrate. Equally obvious is that these statements are separate to my claims about police not policing themselves where I used domestic violence they inflict with impunity as evidence of that statement. You are welcome to believe that police commit widespread violence against their families but not against the people they arrest. It seems an unreasonable position to be in but you are free to have it.