4 ms·
I think Hashicorp will enter monitoring next. Netdata would be a great fit (OSS, fat agent, huge metric granularity, deep infra and network insights)
by bugsense 5y ago
I think Hashicorp will enter monitoring next. Netdata would be a great fit (OSS, fat agent, huge metric granularity, deep infra and network insights)
- MetalMatze 5y agoWhat makes you think they will enter monitoring next?
- bugsense 5y agoThey have some many parts of spinning up/change the infrastructure (Terraform), connect the services (Consul), run the apps (Nomad) but not their own way to tell you how well they do. Also monitoring is quite sticky and high margin. I think it makes sense but have no special insight.
- cyberpunk 5y agoI'm not so sure. There's very little wrong with prometheus or influx + Grafana. We're about due another iteration of logging stuff now we've all gone graylog->splunk->elk->Loki though. (And they all suck)
- PanosJee 5y agoThe thing with Netdata is you don't make compromises on number of metrics and Cardinality as the data stay with the node. Netdata.cloud can aggregate on the fly without storing. Check it out
- rad_gruchalski 5y agoI’d love to see their managed platform on premise.
- roffo 5y agoprometheus is amazing though, would be hard to pull me off that
- zenlikethat 5y agoIt's _such_ a crowded space though. Getting into monitoring is often a death trap because companies often think, "Hey, that's gotta be a logical next step, everybody loves dashboards" and then they get smoked by Splunk and Datadog because it's way harder than it looks and already saturated.