4 ms·
It would be a tautological argument for its addition to the list of controlled substances. Like so, "It's a narcotic because it's a controlled substance and it'
by NoSorryCannot 5y ago
It would be a tautological argument for its addition to the list of controlled substances. Like so, "It's a narcotic because it's a controlled substance and it's a controlled substance because it's a narcotic." Calling it a narcotic is not helpful.
I do wish you would stop taking jabs at me personally.
- lostmsu 5y agoNobody made that argument. The cause it for being on the list is "deadly addictive". See above.
- NoSorryCannot 5y agoSee above indeed.
- lostmsu 5y agoI gave you a direct quote. What are you referring to?
- NoSorryCannot 5y agoI'm not being taken for a ride where we pretend that nothing was intended nor implied by calling it a narcotic.
- lostmsu 5y agoYou are being taken for a ride for this statement: > Not a narcotic in any sense of the word.