3 ms·
Who gives the right to define something as addictive and therefore, bad, and other stuff as not and therefore virtuos. Why do we got the right to moralize some
by elzbardico 5y ago
Who gives the right to define something as addictive and therefore, bad, and other stuff as not and therefore virtuos.
Why do we got the right to moralize some stuff as being "an slave of a substance". Aren't we all slaves of water, nutrition, companionship, shelter? Why do I get to feel superior to the cocaine user?
- r00fus 5y ago> Who gives the right to define something as addictive and therefore, bad Data. Decades of data and the societal costs of ignoring addictive substances. The rest of your comment is a set of false equivalencies.
- elzbardico 5y agoHeard the same from other moralists for quite some time about marijuana. They had tons of "data" about the societal costs of it.