4 ms·
This is great news. I had to implement PACER integration back in my days at Gusto for compliance and the pricing among many other things was very annoying to wo
by romanzubenko 5y ago
This is great news. I had to implement PACER integration back in my days at Gusto for compliance and the pricing among many other things was very annoying to work with. The pricing is based on "number of pages" returned, which means that when you submit a query you don't know exactly how it will cost you ahead of time.
- ianhawes 5y agoThat’s the best part of PACER! The other exciting thing is the threatening letter you get from the government when they can’t charge your expired credit card for $9 and threaten to withhold that amount from your tax return if you don’t pay the balance.
- romanzubenko 5y agoThe best part was for us was that after wrangling with their native API, we decided to go with one of the private companies that provide sane API wrapper on top of PACER. It's kinda crazy that there is a small industry of companies who make government api better. You can see some of these services by googling "bankruptcy monitoring".
- Isthatablackgsd 5y agoSame for public sector procurement (Request for Qualification/Proposal) portals. All the portals are annoying because there are 50 of them, and each of the portal have their way of navigation and filters. So, it become PITA to remember every portal tendency. There is a private website that offer a meta indexer service (with filters) that scrapped every single bit of procurement portal contents as for a fee monthly. I forgot the name of the site in the top of my head. It is worth the paid service for procurement.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]