4 ms·
That's subjective and I disagree. There are near unlimited temptations already, adding another one does nothing. The onus is on the individual. How about we al
by hunterb123 5y ago
That's subjective and I disagree. There are near unlimited temptations already, adding another one does nothing. The onus is on the individual.
How about we all just live in a bubble? That'll solve everything.
- edit -
Reaching for a cookie and violating your diet is not the same as forgetting to look at the fricken road.
Either way though, it's your personal responsibility. You can't sue the cookie company because you're a fat ass.
- spicybright 5y agoEase of access actually has a huge effect on how likely someone will reach for it. Taking out the phone, mounting it to the dash, unlocking the screen, etc. vs tapping a few times on the big touchscreen already there are different levels of effort. If you're on a diet, you're less likely to eat cookies if you have to go down the street to the store than if they're already in your cupboard. Doesn't mean you're being oppressed by some cookie-proof bubble.
- manicdee 5y agoGames being played on the screen in front of the driver is not a good idea, it’s just another distraction with motion and blinking lights that even the most disciplined driver can’t ignore.
- hunterb123 5y agoIt's not in front of the driver and if you can't keep your eyes on the road then you shouldn't be driving anyway. I hope many people in this thread aren't driving.
- manicdee 5y agoHuman vision is the problem here, not bad drivers. Are you going to accuse pilots of being bad at their jobs when they can't fly a plane while a laser is pointed in their eyes?