3 ms·
Leaving aside that 1% is, in reality, too small a % for employee #1 of most startups, there are two factors that might make it worth it: 1. Route from employee
by craigmc 15y ago
Leaving aside that 1% is, in reality, too small a % for employee #1 of most startups, there are two factors that might make it worth it:
1. Route from employee #1 to v. senior position (with commensurately higher salary) is shorter* irrespective of whether the employee stays with the startup or moves on. (*Shorter than if the employee was working as a small cog elsewhere), and thus there is a fairly strong "jam tomorrow" argument that can be made.
2. Route from employee #1 to owning your own funded startup is again shorter. As employee #1, if you do a good job, then you'll be considered a de facto founder, and thus will have that to add to your pitch when it is your turn to try and raise $500k.
A third factor is that money is not everything. Working for a startup can be awesome, and might give you a whole range of professional and life experiences that you would not get when sucking down at your $100k pa teat.
- AlexeyMK 15y agoAgreed. One of the biggest intangibles of being an early employee is the amount learned, which (I imagine) is better than the learning for an investor. The path of early employee => founder is pretty well trodden. Aaron Patzer of Mint and Drew Houston of Dropbox are two immediate examples that come to mind. Who else am I missing?
- 2arrs2ells 15y agoAdam D'Angelo