4 ms·
One thing I do want to point out is that "not allowing any apps to interfere with 911 calls" is much more complex than it sounds: 1. What about someone who has
by Sophira 5y ago
One thing I do want to point out is that "not allowing any apps to interfere with 911 calls" is much more complex than it sounds:
1. What about someone who has a tablet (with no cellular functionality) but has a VoIP app installed?
Clearly, the only way to call 911 on such a device would be for it to go through the VoIP app, so it seems like Android at the very least still needs VoIP apps to be able to handle 911 calls under certain circumstances, such as when there is no cellular functionality.
2. How about a situation where a cellular phone has no communication with any cell towers (for any network) but has a VoIP app installed and access to wifi?
Unlikely, to be sure, but possible. In this case, the only way for the phone to reach 911 would, again, be through the VoIP app. If 911 access must get through no matter what, Android would have to let the call go through the app, despite that the phone has cellular functionality.
Those are likely just a couple of instances and there's almost certainly others I haven't thought of.
- interpol_p 5y agoA solution could be to give the Android system dialer first preference. If it fails to call the number (network issues, no signal) it could automatically pass off the call to the first registered VoIP app That said, the Google Play store should also have more stringent reviews for apps that want dialer access. Their review should verify whether emergency services can be called regardless of signed-in status, and location
- jacquesm 5y agoI would be happy to get that somewhere in Google someone is either signing off on such a review requirement right now or has done so in the last couple of days.