4 ms·

I honestly feel like NYTimes is not going to cover it for political reasons. I am happy to be convinced otherwise.

• tablespoon 5y ago
  > I honestly feel like NYTimes is not going to cover it for political reasons. I am happy to be convinced otherwise. Explain those "political reasons," please.
  • systemvoltage 5y ago
    NYT is extremely predictable - both in its choice of what to inform its viewers as well as what will fit their political stance (globalists). If you need this to be spelled out, either you’re being rhetorical or you’re uninformed - I suspect the former.
    • tablespoon 5y ago
      > If you need this to be spelled out, either you’re being rhetorical or you’re uninformed - I suspect the former. No, I suspect you have things wrong in this case, but you're being so vague it's difficult to figure out where the error is. > NYT is extremely predictable - both in its choice of what to inform its viewers as well as what will fit their political stance (globalists). Even if that's true, it's no reason to assume they wouldn't publish this story for some ideological reason, especially given they've published very similar things in the past.
      • systemvoltage 5y ago
        Btw Fox is covering this story! Very predictable.
        • tablespoon 5y ago
          > Btw Fox is covering this story! Very predictable. This? https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/apple-tim-cook-secret-deal-china https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/apple-tim-cook-secret-de... It's just a "The Information reported..." rehash. Everything about this except the original story that I've seen so far has been like that.