3 ms·
Oddly enough there was no evidence provided for the original claim, either. This despite there being many sources of this estimattioj laid out directly in the o
by epistasis 5y ago
Oddly enough there was no evidence provided for the original claim, either. This despite there being many sources of this estimattioj laid out directly in the original article. The comment didn't mention why the original articles' various methods do not work.
- AnimalMuppet 5y agoFair point. But to me, I hold the reply to a higher standard. Why? Because a claim can be interesting (in the HN sense), even without evidence. A "no it's not" is less interesting, even though it's also a claim. Maybe that's just me...