The article starts with a shoddy overreach about group dynamics, countered by countless exceptions raised on this page where groups in fact self-correct. Then

The article starts with a shoddy overreach about group dynamics, countered by countless exceptions raised on this page where groups in fact self-correct. Then it continues with a howler about the supposed "sustainability" of for-profit enterprise. The engine behind the success of marketplace capitalism is creative destruction! In a healthy marketplace for-profit entities must constantly compete to stay alive, and those that can't adapt die because they are not sustainable. There's something to the idea that groups are reluctant to change course, but we aren't learning anything about it from this article, which chose to go down the path of ideological screed.