I should not have used software. I should have said apps, software, and services. Copyright is not what I was thinking of. I was including SaaS and so on in my

I should not have used software. I should have said apps, software, and services. Copyright is not what I was thinking of. I was including SaaS and so on in my thinking when I wrote my comment. So take out copyright. Any charging of any digital service, subscription, et al, can have similar morally backed reasons to get around paying + getting everyone to get around paying. Off top of head. World is inherently unfair. Being poor is unfair. Charging money for digital subscriptions keeps the rich, rich. Keeps poor people out. We should be for figuring out how to get around all digital payments for digital services + subscriptions. > nobody ever signed a social contract That’s not how social contracts work. Social contracts aren’t meant to be signed. There’s no signed contract for person A to do any of the following in public: not to purposefully smell bad enough to have peoples gag reflexes kick in, for Person A not to repeatedly throw up in their hands and very dramatically repeatedly consume it all again, or for person A to laugh to themselves and loudly comment to themselves about how ugly or silly or { insert any other negativity } people near them are. I can give other examples that are digitally focused too. in general nearly all people adhere to a number of social contracts and expect the same of others.