>You're recognizing the quality of the content does not really lie in a singular post or link, but with the poster, in a general sense. Correct me if I am wron

>You're recognizing the quality of the content does not really lie in a singular post or link, but with the poster, in a general sense. Correct me if I am wrong but, isn't that how Digg used to work? I remember there were these few prominent accounts that had a lot of posts "promoted" and made the site worthless when they started posting crap.