3 ms·
This article reads like an anecdotal rant. > Groups never admit failure. > I’m hard pressed to find examples in history of large groups that said, “We thought
by smugglerFlynn 5y ago
This article reads like an anecdotal rant.
> Groups never admit failure.
> I’m hard pressed to find examples in history of large groups that said, “We thought A, but the answer’s actually B.”
First statement does not follow from the second. The rest of the article is even worse in its sudden jumps to conclusions.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- clpm4j 5y agoThe author is Naval Ravikant who is a wealthy VC and pseudo-philosopher. He's clearly a smart guy but also seemingly disconnected from reality at this point in his career.
- smugglerFlynn 5y agoA piece that has no facts backing the point, which exploits confirmation and conformity biases in readers, is just a badly researched and biased piece, regardless of author.
- drekipus 5y agoWrite a counter piece then, or don't. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯