> the 60% office is not a good place to work Why? I've worked in person, ~40% remote, and 100% remote. I thoughtv~40% remote was far and away the best work si

> the 60% office is not a good place to work Why? I've worked in person, ~40% remote, and 100% remote. I thoughtv~40% remote was far and away the best work situation. The only necessary component to make it work was that my team had to be there on the same days. So far as I can tell, for trust building and certain kinds of collaborative work (some of which is super important) nothing beats in person. Given that the survery results indicate most people still don't want full remote, why wouldn't they go with a mixed in-person/remote setup?