4 ms·

Is this model as closed as GPT-3, or has it been open-sourced?

• coolspot 5y ago
  Language models are too dangerous to be accesible by mere mortals. Among OpenAI (and MS), Google and Nvidia, none of them have released their pretrained large language models.
  • lapinot 5y ago
    > Language models are too dangerous to be accesible by mere mortals. Just like strong cryptography right? This is bullshit. Either it's plain dangerous and you shouldn't be doing it or it's morally fine and it should be open. Their final usecase is pushing ads or extorting data from unsuspecting people's interactions anyway so who are they kidding with their ethics.. I mean they'd be foolish giving it away: it's a big investment and a rare good, highly strategic. Let's not wrap that kind of action in some savior stance. They are just making money and it's ugly.
    • runnerup 5y ago
      > Their final usecase is pushing ads or extorting data from unsuspecting people's interactions anyway so who are they kidding with their ethics.. The final usecase is actually brainwashing. There could come a future where every single comment you read online is not a human but rather a multi-faceted AI tailored specifically for you. Your current worldview could be measured and the AI could steer you closer towards a "target" worldview. The comments presented to you could also be moderately coordinated with comments presented to other humans in your real-life circles to establish "serendipity" where you and your friends/family/coworkers evolve similar ideas/worldviews together to reinforce your new beliefs. And even catalyze coordinated human efforts towards common goals. Doing this could lead most people to believe almost anything. Theoretically this could also be coupled with VR chatrooms to enhance salience.