3 ms·
> It states that twitter told the user "the account was “artificially” amplifying information" By that logic, Twitter should also be blocking @jack's account d
by sebastien_b 5y ago
> It states that twitter told the user "the account was “artificially” amplifying information"
By that logic, Twitter should also be blocking @jack's account due to all the Bitcoin-pushing going on there too.
In fact, I think I'll go report it now...
- threatofrain 5y agoDoes @jack use dummy accounts to boost the popularity of his tweets?
- sebastien_b 5y agoHow many #bitcoin accounts out there boost anything he and Musk say about Bitcoin?
- johnny_b_g 5y agoThat's not even a relevant question - the excuse given by Twitter was "the account was “artificially” amplifying information" not "bots were 'artificially' amplifying the account"
- FDSGSG 5y agoDid you speak with twitter directly? Who provided you with this excuse?
- sebastien_b 5y agosigh can't even bother reading the thread?
- sebastien_b 5y agoOh, but you could read this?