4 ms·

As a programmer, I do not expect a designer to know, understand, or be proficient with coding. I don't disagree that any designer who can do both has a tremendo

As a programmer, I do not expect a designer to know, understand, or be proficient with coding. I don't disagree that any designer who can do both has a tremendous advantage. But, I think it should be possible to just sit down, "draw a picture", and have it just work on every current platform, at various screen resolutions, and various internet connections. That's not possible right now, but I think that's because us programmers have done a terrible job. We have built awful tools. Some are less awful than others, yes, but with 2012 just around the corner and about two decades of web development behind us, we still have not developed a tool which allows a designer to sit down, and do what they are best at, and make their imaginings into a working reality without the assistance of an engineer who speaks a strange vocabulary. I would not expect a sculptor to need to know the finer points of structural engineering. Any sculptor who did would have a clear advantage over their peers -- but I am skeptical that it would make them a better sculptor.

Hawramani 15y ago
Thinking of this from supply and demand theory, programmers only build programs that have a market, and there doesn't seem to be a market for such a tool (there isn't a large group of people vocally demanding it). I'd guess that there is a market for it, but like the market for the iPhone before Steve Jobs, nobody powerful enough has discovered it yet.
radley 15y ago
Sounds like Flash to me.
- spiralganglion 15y ago
  Not at all, or ActionScript wouldn't need to be such a sprawling language.
  - radley 15y ago
    That only happened because programmers freak out over the timeline. Tons of artists use Flash using little more than stop(), gotoAndPlay(), & onRelease().
deleted 15y ago
[deleted]
scorpion032 15y ago
Where engineering meets art so intricately, that even any amount of co-ordination between them, wouldn't help, where both need to be thought through simultaneously and equally, such as this logo: http://www.google.com/logos/2011/graham.html http://www.google.com/logos/2011/graham.html gives me a kick.

Hawramani 15y ago

Thinking of this from supply and demand theory, programmers only build programs that have a market, and there doesn't seem to be a market for such a tool (there isn't a large group of people vocally demanding it). I'd guess that there is a market for it, but like the market for the iPhone before Steve Jobs, nobody powerful enough has discovered it yet.

radley 15y ago

Sounds like Flash to me.

spiralganglion 15y ago
Not at all, or ActionScript wouldn't need to be such a sprawling language.
- radley 15y ago
  That only happened because programmers freak out over the timeline. Tons of artists use Flash using little more than stop(), gotoAndPlay(), & onRelease().

deleted 15y ago

[deleted]

scorpion032 15y ago

Where engineering meets art so intricately, that even any amount of co-ordination between them, wouldn't help, where both need to be thought through simultaneously and equally, such as this logo: http://www.google.com/logos/2011/graham.html http://www.google.com/logos/2011/graham.html gives me a kick.