3 ms·
My point is that investement isn’t money that flows from the rich to the poor, like the trickle down analogy would suggest. Investment is meant to be recouped.
by d--b 5y ago
My point is that investement isn’t money that flows from the rich to the poor, like the trickle down analogy would suggest. Investment is meant to be recouped. It’s always about creating a bigger pie…
- flavius29663 5y ago> money that flows from the rich to the poor Of course not, which is why whoever proposes these policies doesn't call them "trickle down". But what the poor will get is jobs, better jobs than 20 or 100 years ago, that pay for more goods and services compared to 20 or 100 years ago. Which is true, the working poor today live very well compared to even rich people 20 or 100 years ago.