3 ms·
> the wealthy can only consume so much That is exactly the point. The wealthy cannot consume too much, so they will invest the rest. Investment means factories
by flavius29663 5y ago
> the wealthy can only consume so much
That is exactly the point. The wealthy cannot consume too much, so they will invest the rest. Investment means factories and jobs for the poor. The government could take the money and do the investments themselves, but that never really works well. With so many inefficiencies, the governments would slow down the economic development significantly. Communist countries had 5 year plans setup by the government and they fell further and further behind in the market. All the money was distributed by the government, based on studies and decisions made mostly by engineers and politicians (e.g. if a dam was deemed profitable it was built no matter what. If nuclear is better it was getting built, and get public support afterwards etc.), and still they fell behind.
- d--b 5y agoMy point is that investement isn’t money that flows from the rich to the poor, like the trickle down analogy would suggest. Investment is meant to be recouped. It’s always about creating a bigger pie…
- flavius29663 5y ago> money that flows from the rich to the poor Of course not, which is why whoever proposes these policies doesn't call them "trickle down". But what the poor will get is jobs, better jobs than 20 or 100 years ago, that pay for more goods and services compared to 20 or 100 years ago. Which is true, the working poor today live very well compared to even rich people 20 or 100 years ago.