3 ms·

Looks like the account possibly tried to implicate an Intel agency several hours earlier? https://twitter.com/HardensBetter/status/1468304975998578689 https://

• jevoten 5y ago
  Is that against Twitter rules? Implying intelligence agencies would secretly do something untoward? Edit: The cached tweet: https://www.twitter.com/HardensBetter/status/1468304975998578689 https://www.twitter.com/HardensBetter/status/146830497599857... Many think Epstein was connected to intelligence. Evidence includes making videos of his guests having sex with young girls, a classic intelligence entrapment technique used by every spy agency in the world, a large supply of diamonds and Austrian passport to make a quick escape.
• lp0_on_fire 5y ago
  The past 5 years has taught us that on twitter it's ok to imply (and in many cases outright state) that the sitting president of the US is a literally Russian plant) without a fear of a ban. In a normal world this would mean you could also imply that Epstein is an intelligence asset without fear of a ban. But this is twitter world so who knows?