A commenter in that Twitter thread claims it was banned "Because it was a dodgy account!", but doesn't explain how it was "dodgy" - any ideas? > if they're act

A commenter in that Twitter thread claims it was banned "Because it was a dodgy account!", but doesn't explain how it was "dodgy" - any ideas? > if they're acting on behalf of powerful state actors, how can we say that's not suppression on speech? It's suppression of speech either way. The only difference state actors make is if the 1st amendment forbids it.