4 ms·
> I wonder how they manage to keep the FP64 units busy They don’t. See https://www.amd.com/en/graphics/server-accelerators-benchmarks https://www.amd.com/en/gr
by my123 5y ago
> I wonder how they manage to keep the FP64 units busy
They don’t. See https://www.amd.com/en/graphics/server-accelerators-benchmarks https://www.amd.com/en/graphics/server-accelerators-benchmar....
The MI250X, despite being dual big dies, doesn’t do especially well.
- arcanus 5y agoI disagree. The website you linked to shows speed-ups on MI250X between 1.6x and 3x higher than A100. The theoretical memory bandwidth speed-up between MI250X and A100 is only 1.6X (3.2 TB/s vs 2.0 TB/s). Thus, I'd say they are seeing the advantage of higher FP64 compute in those applications.
- volta83 5y agoMakes sense. Comparing nodes with 2x or 4x MI250X vs 4x or 8x A100-80 it doesn't really seem that there is any speed up at all for memory bound apps.