I’m also a bit skeptical of the timing of the article as this “news” is about a contract that, coincidentally, is about to expire: > If there were no objection

I’m also a bit skeptical of the timing of the article as this “news” is about a contract that, coincidentally, is about to expire: > If there were no objections from either side, the deal would be automatically be extended for an additional year until May 2022, according to the agreement. I would imagine they’re currently in negotiations for whatever the next iteration of this agreement will be. Perhaps Mr. Cook is looking for a bit of leverage?