5 ms·
I think this could have lots of side affects (even though i agree that copyrights have some negative aspects to them). One big issue is that when things aren't
by vineyardmike 5y ago
I think this could have lots of side affects (even though i agree that copyrights have some negative aspects to them).
One big issue is that when things aren't bound by copyright, the originals can be adulterated and you won't know:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/19/technology/amazon-orwell-1984.html https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/19/technology/amazon-orwell-...
> The New York Times reports that in some countries where "1984" is in the public domain opportunists are printing cheap versions of the novel and listing them on Amazon, avoiding paying royalties owed to Orwell's estate in the US.
> The New York Times found 11 of the 12 fake Orwell books it ordered were dispatched from an Amazon warehouse and were labelled "new." The books cost as little as $3.
This seems like an obvious net-negative for society.
- hattmall 5y agoHow is this a net negative for any one other than the Orwell estate??
- kragen 5y agoSeems like a net positive: more people can read 1984. If your concern is that someone might publish a modified version of the text, why, public-domain status makes that easy to detect and analyze, because anyone can share the original version, which copyright makes illegal.
- przemub 5y agoOrwell is dead and the society, which did far more for immemorializing his thought than his estate, should own the rights. Are they adulterated or just reprinted?