But that's not the point you've been making, it's not what I've been arguing against. Your point has been "survival in rural areas is untenable and so people ha

But that's not the point you've been making, it's not what I've been arguing against. Your point has been "survival in rural areas is untenable and so people have to move to cities for better prospects, therefore moving to the city is not a choice." My point was always "people go where they need to go based on their needs and priorities and survival outside of cities is not any harder than inside them, therefore moving to them is a choice." If anything, survival is easier outside of cities, because cost of living is cheaper and the minimum wage rate is the same. Anyway, we started with you saying you want to move more rural but you can't. But is that true? Could you do it, if you were willing to work a different type of job?