3 ms·
There is a chance that your use case is basic and hasn’t changed in 20 years, but I think there is a higher chance of it’s a case of general hatred for Microsof
by dhruvdh 5y ago
There is a chance that your use case is basic and hasn’t changed in 20 years, but I think there is a higher chance of it’s a case of general hatred for Microsoft.
> only bloat to keep up with the need to create a need for faster processors.
Do people not see what their feelings towards Microsoft turns them into?
- pomian 5y agoWhy hate? I don't hate, Microsoft or Office, or anything like that. Those are choices, things. You can't hate things. I agree with this OP that office had all the functionality almost everyone needed twenty years ago. Most of the changes to office have been cosmetic and frustrating to established users. Perhaps their could have been add ons - like in browsers, for more functionality that certain users need, without messing with established work flows and ease of use, which are also important.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- garbagecoder 5y agoList one feature from Word that didn’t exist in 2003 that you depend on.
- dhruvdh 5y agoI don’t use Word at all, there are many other pieces of software in the Office suite, many which simply did not exist 20 years ago. If you think nothing has changed then it is very likely you don’t need Office.
- gsinclair 5y agoWord’s modern Equation Editor.
- garbagecoder 5y agoFair enough, I do like Latex input.