4 ms·
> maybe the COTR should've rejected the work if it was unacceptable. That would require the spec to have been written to allow that kind of rejection. I strong
by pdonis 5y ago
> maybe the COTR should've rejected the work if it was unacceptable.
That would require the spec to have been written to allow that kind of rejection. I strongly suspect the spec was not written that well.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- mpyne 5y agoExactly. VMS probably literally "meets the requirements". HN dunked all over that agile vs. waterfall article from a few days ago, wondering whether or not waterfall wasn't just some boogeyman that a bunch of consultants had to invent to sell certificates, but I'm here to tell you waterfall is a thing and it's still alive and kicking in the Navy, even now.