2 ms·
I agree with your characterization of court music, but again I don't understand why it should represent the entire history of the music business. At the same ti
by burkaman 5y ago
I agree with your characterization of court music, but again I don't understand why it should represent the entire history of the music business. At the same time that European royals were commissioning symphonies as a status symbol, musicians were holding independent concerts where people paid money to hear some music and then went home.
I don't think it's really relevant that many musicians are poor. Most writers in history have been poor, but the history of the book business is still mostly about people paying money to read a book.
- IggleSniggle 5y agoAnd I agree with what you’re saying, too. I don’t think it’s relevant to music that many musicians are poor, but I think it’s relevant to what I thought was being discussed. I thought we were talking about the music / money relationship, and the degree to which “ulterior motives” play onto the music/money transaction.