4 ms·
Netflix only provides one very static huge library. As long as you move a few PB around the globe on your video release date, Netflix is fine. It's very easy
by Hekioi 5y ago
Netflix only provides one very static huge library.
As long as you move a few PB around the globe on your video release date, Netflix is fine.
It's very easy to build a Netflix in comparison to yt.
I would argue that for Netflix going into yt direction would eat up there revenue baseline fast.
- ethbr0 5y agoNetflix could square the circle by offering "YT for indie filmmakers." More static content than YT. Better viewer:creator ratio. Fewer content headaches. Content moderation is lower volume and amounts to watching the film. And closer to their existing product fit. It's actually kind of mind-boggling that Netflix hasn't pivoted into a turnkey solution (standard deal + optional financing support + broadcast platform) for mass-market film-making. Everyone's content starved, it's an obvious weakness that Amazon / Disney / ATT are blind to, and somehow Reed Hastings hasn't pushed in that direction. It's literally what Netflix is famous for doing (twice!): be the platform.
- SahAssar 5y ago> Everyone's content starved I've been mostly hearing the opposite, most people feel like they have more content they want to watch than they have time to.
- hazza_n_dazza 5y agogreat idea, however I think they would become more like a hosting company with more overheads - so probably better for them to stick to their higher margin service they offer now. also, i bet they doo offer something like "(standard deal + optional financing support + broadcast platform) for mass-market film-making." just not to everyone
- Trex_Egg 5y agowhat is mean by "PB"?