3 ms·
They aren't banning it. They are saying they won't do business with anyone involved in such things. That's not remotely the same.
by easytiger 5y ago
They aren't banning it. They are saying they won't do business with anyone involved in such things. That's not remotely the same.
- ceejayoz 5y agoGovernment doesn't get to do that - it's a de facto punishment for the use of First Amendment-protected speech. This is why the KKK gets to adopt highways. https://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/us/georgia-kkk-adopt-a-highway-lawsuit/index.html https://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/us/georgia-kkk-adopt-a-highwa...
- kthejoker2 5y ago"They aren't banning being black. They are saying they won't do business with anyone involved in being black. That's not remotely the same." Your logic is deeply flawed.
- easytiger 5y agoCan you demonstrate how that statement is equivalent?
- kthejoker2 5y agoThe logic is equivalent, both are clear violations of civil rights.
- easytiger 5y agoPeople can choose to do business with whomever they want.