6 ms·

Ok lets make it goverment free. So basically you are saying: - He is allowed doing cancelling - But someone else isn't allowed to do it Strange..

• skinnymuch 5y ago
  I’m not sure what you are saying. I’m trying to understand.
  • MichaelRazum 5y ago
    Which point you don't undersand? I'm glad to help.
    • skinnymuch 5y ago
      Things I didn’t understand: - Taking out which Govt? - Who is the he who is allowed to cancel? What is this person cancelling? - Who is the some one else who is not allowed to cancel? If the last is referring to the Govt and big authority. That’s not cancelling. That’s authority and/or Govt overreach.
      • MichaelRazum 5y ago
        Hope this explains it - Taking out which Govt? I mean by that three parties. His company let name it A. Some Israeli Company let name it B and Govt let name it C. So let's just say there are real humans behind A, B and C. Now A is cancelling B (that is my understanding). In response C cancels A. - Who is the he who is allowed to cancel? What is this person cancelling? As I understand this person (A) is refusing service to Israeli companies. Actively participating at BDS. By that he is cancelling B. - Who is the some one else who is not allowed to cancel? I think now it should be clear. See above. It's C. So my assumption was that he actively participated at BDS and refused services to other companies. If that is false I take my argumentation back. But if not I don't see his reason to complain.