This essay sets up puritan standards that nothing in this world can live up to. The only relevant question to ask yourself is whether this solves something and

This essay sets up puritan standards that nothing in this world can live up to. The only relevant question to ask yourself is whether this solves something and whether that something is worth solving. So if you think thats skins bought in games by kid gamers is better of by being owned by the gaming company than the gamer who bought it. If you think that governments printing money at will to solve problems they created is better than having more deflatory assets available for normal citizens who cant afford a house. If you think the current cobol and pre internet protocol based banking system is better than a more flexible system allowing for solutions which were impossible before. If you think that the digital world should be governed using physical world tools. If you think only accredited investors should be able to make high risk bets. Then by all means be against Web3. But this idea that only if perfect is it worth moving forward with web3 is an absurd standard only allowed by philosophers and other academics who dont actually move the world forward. And yes Web3 have its own set of problems, but they are much better problems to have than a world without Web3