3 ms·
I’m curious what you are referring to here. Do you have any examples I can read up on?
by discordance 5y ago
I’m curious what you are referring to here. Do you have any examples I can read up on?
- RicoElectrico 5y agoDave from EEVblog ranted about their gov approach to tech (and environment) a few times in the past.
- chris_wot 5y agoThat’s the LNP for you.
- L_226 5y agoHere you go [Feb 2021]: https://chaser.com.au/national/an-exhaustive-list-of-the-liberal-partys-corruption-over-the-last-7-years/ https://chaser.com.au/national/an-exhaustive-list-of-the-lib...
- roenxi 5y agoWhile there are a lot of items on that list that range from obvious corruption to concerning, the list does itself no favours by including a bunch of stupid stuff. The 2nd item is "Voted against a binding code of conduct designed to ensure politicians act with integrity" - that isn't corruption. The list author just doesn't like their decision. Honestly, none of the top 6 dot points really look concerning and it is arguable if they represent corruption. Some are probably politically motivated ... but most things politicians do are politically motivated.