3 ms·
Its interesting that they abandoned CI Joe. I wouldn't say, I saw this coming. But, unless they wanted to maintain/write a full blown CI server themselves, it w
by gnufied 15y ago
Its interesting that they abandoned CI Joe. I wouldn't say, I saw this coming. But, unless they wanted to maintain/write a full blown CI server themselves, it would have got harder for multiple projects.
- cmer 15y agoIndeed. I'd love to hear the details on this. I was considering CI Joe for a project.
- rsanheim 15y agoThis isn't surprising to me. While CI Joe was decent and simple, its really extremely limiting once you want to do anything moderately complicated. Jenkins has a crummy UI, but it is very powerful and has a lot of useful plugins. If you are moving to any sort of continuous deployment setup, as Github is close to, you really need something as powerful as Jenkins.
- ethank 15y agoWhat do they use for a CI tool?
- gthank 15y agoJenkins.