The article was thin on such details. > Even after 15 years post-fire, 80% of the surveyed plots contained no new trees. So 20% did, why? > Global warming ha

The article was thin on such details. > Even after 15 years post-fire, 80% of the surveyed plots contained no new trees. So 20% did, why? > Global warming has contributed to a doubling of the number of acres burned across the country since the 1990s. While I agree that climate change is real, so is mismanagement of our forests. Which is to blame most? Frankly, the use of the phrase Global Warming (instead of the more accurate and more accepted Climate Change) makes we suspect of the strength of the argument.