4 ms·
For reasons decided long ago, the company I'm at uses Mercurial, and I don't think we're in a position to retrain everyone and move to a private GitHub repo. A
by terinjokes 15y ago
For reasons decided long ago, the company I'm at uses Mercurial, and I don't think we're in a position to retrain everyone and move to a private GitHub repo.
Anyone know of ideas for doing code reviews for the whole pull request, commit, or a single line like GitHub? This is probably the most beneficial part for us.
- tednaleid 15y agoCould you use a private BitBucket repo for this? BitBucket has the same kind of pull request functionality that I'd think you could use to emulate this continuous delivery style.
- terinjokes 15y agoTo be completely honest, I've never been satisfied with using BitBucket, doing anything is comparitively harder, and honestly it just feels like I'm using an incomplete GitHub clone. (and I really don't like support teams that are "creatively bankrupt") I'll look into if the issues feature works for us, but me might have to roll something of our own. Doesn't mean I won't make the pitch for Git yet again.
- kevingessner 15y agoIf you're using Mercurial, Kiln offers code reviews and repository management, hosted by us or on your server. http://www.fogcreek.com/kiln/ http://www.fogcreek.com/kiln/ (disclosure: I work on Kiln at Fog Creek)