3 ms·
It’s time for pedestrian infrastructure that is safe by design. Most of these fatalities could be prevented by lowering the speed limit.
by pharmakom 5y ago
It’s time for pedestrian infrastructure that is safe by design. Most of these fatalities could be prevented by lowering the speed limit.
- riffic 5y agosigns and fines have minimal impact on driver behavior. Apply treatments to the road that alter driver behavior - the perception of danger is quite a motivator in reducing speeds (tullock's spike for instance).
- jwagenet 5y agoLowering the speed limit doesn’t make sense if there are wide streets with wide lanes (more comfortable to drive in) and no enforcement. In SF it would be preferable to reduce street width in reality or artificially with protected bike lanes, bus/muni right of way, etc on wide streets like Geary or Van Ness .
- colpabar 5y ago> In SF it would be preferable to reduce street width Absolutely. It seems like the best way to reduce speeds in cities is to make it uncomfortable to drive fast in them. Big wide streets make it feel like you're going "slow" at 25mph, so people go faster. Of course, we could also slowly carve out areas of cities where cars are not allowed, but how will businesses survive if people can't park directly in front of them? /s
- Gigachad 5y agoIt’s funny that in my city, the most active retail area is a pedestrian only street. Anything with heavy car traffic tends to have more intentional destination type stuff.
- IMTDb 5y ago> Anything with heavy car traffic tends to have more intentional destination type stuff. Is it possible that the intentional destination is the pedestrian street, to do your shopping ? Remove the heavy traffic lanes around it and people will go shopping somewhere else or go to amazon instead. In my city that's what's happening, the pedestrian only street used to be the place to go shopping for clothes/luxuries. Now it's impossible to get there so people go to off city malls instead (which are thriving) or online (also thriving), and street stores are slowly dying.
- Gigachad 5y agoThis street has many highrise offices, universities and residential buildings around it so its a destination of a lot of foot traffic from buildings, not so much somewhere you drive to access. There are also multi level parks on the ends, you just can't drive through it.
- laurent92 5y ago[flagged]
- wahern 5y agoAs a country France might not be going in the direction you think it's going: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/28/world/europe/france-albi-french-towns-fading.html https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/28/world/europe/france-albi-... I see that echoed in your post: "It has the added benefit of pushing right-wing people out of the cities back to the countryside". Perhaps what's happening is that France is seeing a transition to suburban communities. If so, enjoy your walkable town centers now while commerce remains viable. At some point in the future you may find yourself needing to trek to the big box retailer outside town, just as many of us urban Americans unfortunately have to do. :(
- vineyardmike 5y agoI really like seeing streets that have seating where parking spots used to be. Some popular areas have whole blocks converted. They really make it hard to jaywalk, and offer lots of barrier between sidewalk and cars. That said, it probably sucks for bicyclists.
- OnlineGladiator 5y agoThe speed limit is 25 mph through most of San Francisco, even some of the major routes (like 19th Avenue which is 6 lanes wide with its own divider) are limited to 30 mph. Narrow alleys are 15 mph by default, Market Street is 20 mph, Van Ness is 25 mph. This city probably has the lowest speed limits I've ever seen, and I've lived on 3 continents. https://data.sfgov.org/Transportation/Map-of-Speed-Limits/ttcm-fwt2 https://data.sfgov.org/Transportation/Map-of-Speed-Limits/tt...
- Levitz 5y agoWell, in Spain it's 30km/h max in the whole city, 18mp/h. Thing is, nobody normally goes that slow, from a point on drivers will start ignoring it and decide on a speed themselves.
- alex_young 5y agoMy observations in Europe are pretty much opposite to this. Many EU cities are max 30 kph (18.5 mph) on most roads. https://qz.com/2056530/european-cities-are-slowing-down-their-street-traffic/ https://qz.com/2056530/european-cities-are-slowing-down-thei...
- Gwypaas 5y agoYou have to separate the road from the stroad. Roads in Europe might be up to 60-70 kph even in a city center, but they also have calming intersections with roundabouts and to get on an off regularly or even ramps. Streets tend to be 30-40 kph depending on the place with lots of calming. The Ugly, Dangerous, and Inefficient Stroads found all over the US & Canada: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORzNZUeUHAM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORzNZUeUHAM
- dahfizz 5y agoThey could have just as easily (easier, even) been avoided if pedestrians followed the law and used the existing infrastructure.
- encoderer 5y agoSpeed limits are set in part by how fast people actually drive on a street. You need to go further up-funnel and redesign streets so speeding doesn’t feel safe.
- atom_arranger 5y agoIn Bangkok the roads are very wide and busy. Every couple hundred meters they have bridges that go over them. It's an interesting solution to the problem. It's nice that you just walk up the stairs and cross, no need to worry about the traffic. They're all over the place, most of them much more minimal, but similar to this: https://previews.123rf.com/images/ruslan_kokarev/ruslan_kokarev1806/ruslan_kokarev180600069/103206204-bangkok-thailand-july-19-2017-elevated-pedestrian-walkway-skywalk-at-ratchadamri-road-near-central-w.jpg https://previews.123rf.com/images/ruslan_kokarev/ruslan_koka...
- pharmakom 5y agoWhy should pedestrians be inconvenienced? Make the cars wait or send them the long way around.
- twiddling 5y agosucks if you're mobility impaired ( wheelchair ) , and with ADA the costs will be too prohibitive for most locales, so they'll just paint some zebra stripes and put up a flashing light
- kspacewalk2 5y agoAlso sucks if you have a stroller, luggage, pets, small kids, a bum leg, if you're old or just tired.
- atom_arranger 5y agoThere are crosswalks on street level, you have to go further and wait though. Some of them have escalators or elevators.
- selimthegrim 5y agoIn Karachi too IIRC
- elgenie 5y agoIf the physical design of the street says that it expects to be traversed at 40mph, people will drive 35 to 45mph on it even if the posted speed limit says 25. This situation offers tremendous benefits to traffic police officers a bit behind on their ticket writing, but minimal benefits for pedestrian safety, because the people likely to notice the sign and slow down were already the people likely to notice pedestrians and drive defensively.
- throwaway0a5e 5y agoIs this satire? The speed limit has barely anything to do with pedestrian infrastructure. It's the interaction points between the two where the problems are (intersections, crossings, etc). Give people (both pedestrians and drivers) the opportunities to get where they need to go without getting in each other's way and 99/100 they'll pull it off successfully.
- kspacewalk2 5y agoIs this satire? Vehicle speed is one of the best predictors of pedestrian fatality and injury severity in an accident. When a pedestrian is struck by a driver, almost nothing else matters as much as the vehicle's speed.
- notacoward 5y ago> speed is one of the best predictors of pedestrian fatality and injury severity True, but a total red herring. Speed might be the main factor affecting severity of injury, but it's not the main factor affecting probability in a left-turn scenario. Remember left turns? It's what OP is about. Very few people are going the speed limit while turning left, and that would remain true even with lower limits. Visibility is the dominant factor here - around other vehicles, around the A-pillar, etc. The least severe accident is the one that doesn't happen. "Lower speed limits" is a great hobby horse, but not one that belongs here.
- speeder 5y agospeed limits... doesn't work. I live in a city where they lowered the speed limits heavily, the result is law abiding drivers constantly almost crashing because they have eyes glued on the speedometer to keep themselves under the speed limit while on roads that "feel" faster. And the non-law abiding drivers that will happily crash into the rear of law abiding ones, since everyone is same speed, when someone DO obey the speed limit, that person gets rear ended as the other drivers get surprised. Instead you need better road design. (also, putting speed bumps after long wide straights is just a retarded idea, saw a bunch of times people going airborne on those, including one time where a guy managed to leave his wheel STUCK INSIDE a wall, at the exact height a person head should be...).