3 ms·
> they are the solution to many of most onerous problems with wireless service today We disagree with what is the most onerous problem with wireless service to
by MatthewPhillips 15y ago
> they are the solution to many of most onerous problems with wireless service today
We disagree with what is the most onerous problem with wireless service today. The most onerous problem with wireless service today is carriers promising things that they can't deliver, then finding ways to up-charge their customers for features that were originally promised.
- achompas 15y ago> The most onerous problem with wireless service today is carriers promising things that they can't deliver, then finding ways to up-charge their customers for features that were originally promised. In my opinion these are symptoms of the REAL problem: telecos overcommit to investment in wireless infrastructure, then under-deliver every single time. Afterwards, they use non-sequiturs (iPhone customers keep us from investing! or we want to roll out 4G!) for what is obviously bean-maximizing behavior.
- rhizome 15y agoFunny that the CWA touts that the deal "will create" 96,000 jobs, not mentioning that that number is the high side estimate resulting from a promise by AT&T to invest $8B in infrastructure. I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to estimate how much of that would become reality.
- achompas 15y agoHah! Hard to believe an acquisition like this would create jobs, especially as AT&T sells it as a "bandwidth/infrastructure acquisition."
- beefman 15y agoThat's the problem I'm talking about. See http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2946587 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2946587 and this should also answer your question from the other subthread.