> And these are still the only talking points you have. Dude, I'm not even trying to argue in favor of crypto in this thread. My point was critics will never b

> And these are still the only talking points you have. Dude, I'm not even trying to argue in favor of crypto in this thread. My point was critics will never be satisfied by proponents' arguments because they don't value the one thing blockchains do, which is arrest control from central parties. And here you are, saying it's a solution in search of a problem (i.e. it adds no value) and making arguments like > reverting transactions, enforcing contracts, guaranteeing safety of funds etc. etc. which is exactly what I said you would come back with. Because when you don't value decentralization, the lack of centralized control looks like nothing but downsides. Thank you for proving my point. > don't bother to reply. It's no bother :^)