4 ms·
Those are both true statements. They also don't imply a push model.
by meetups323 5y ago
Those are both true statements. They also don't imply a push model.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- dreyfan 5y agoI don't really see the point of your comment, besides to express some sort of overly pedantic characterization of push vs pull event propagation techniques.
- whimsicalism 5y agoYou're the one making the distinction.
- dreyfan 5y agoAm I? I don’t have a horse in this race. I responded because I felt the “Did anyone really think” comment was arrogant and dismissive. I provided examples where a layperson could easily reach that conclusion.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- tshaddox 5y agoYes. It’s the effect that propagates.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- robertlagrant 5y agoThey do imply a push. A pull would mean that things mightn't spread across the internet in the event no-one requested them. Those statements do imply that things just get spread across the internet automatically.
- whimsicalism 5y agoCan news propagate?
- robertlagrant 5y agoIf someone claimed that in 48 hours everyone on the planet would've heard some news, that would imply a push, yes.
- whimsicalism 5y ago"By 48 hours, the news will have spread around the globe." (a more natural phrasing than propagate in the context of news, but I think pretty identical in implication) does not imply a push model, I just completely disagree with you.