2 ms·
I find disgraceful that this guy is putting the blame on his employees. It is clear that: 1. There is no way competent managers would let 15% of the workforce
by manuelabeledo 5y ago
I find disgraceful that this guy is putting the blame on his employees.
It is clear that:
1. There is no way competent managers would let 15% of the workforce slip so hard, that they are fired for "performance reasons", and
2. If these performance measurements were valid, most of the now fired employees would have been fired long time ago.
Any normal company has quarterly performance reviews, and management has to follow on those. If he only just found out that 15% of his employees were "lazy" or were "stealing wages" (not a thing), but waited until the end of the year, he and his team were being negligent.
- sneak 5y ago> There is no way competent managers would let 15% of the workforce slip so hard Possible, even likely, that 900 layoffs probably encompasses some less than competent managerial staff?
- manuelabeledo 5y agoAnd that is fine. Where are their managers, though.
- Spivak 5y agoAnd this isn't a turtles all the way down thing either. This is the entire point of a hierarchical system. Everyone's performance is monitored and checked by the layer above them up until you hit the CEO. Sure, it's not crazy to have 10% underperformers at any given company, someone has to be below average. But regular pruning doesn't involve mass layoffs like this.