> . 1) That was 10 years ago The Holder doctrine, (as explained in the article that was provided as a source) dates from 1999 and is thus over two decades old.

> . 1) That was 10 years ago The Holder doctrine, (as explained in the article that was provided as a source) dates from 1999 and is thus over two decades old. This doctrine was referenced in 2012 by the head of the Justice Department’s criminal division. If you believe this doctrine is no longer followed, it would behoove you to provide evidence of your own that "too big to jail" hasn't been a guiding doctrine for over two decades. > I can see why you chose to create a throw away account in this case to comment. I now see i'm being trolled by an anonymous account :( I'm sorry I feel for it. Calling someone a troll never improves any discussion and is inappropriate on HN.