You’re utterly confused. Non-notarized paper signatures or apple preview signatures are obviously a questionable practice. They’re still legally binding, but n

You’re utterly confused. Non-notarized paper signatures or apple preview signatures are obviously a questionable practice. They’re still legally binding, but not binding evidence. If there’s a dispute regarding the authenticity of the signature, that’ll require unnecessary litigation that would have been avoided by using a notary or an accepted cryptographic signature. (Or simply a video recording of both parties agreeing to the contract, this is really flexible) Let me quote your original comment: > I just had this conversation with my lawyer, in the Netherlands, and probably most or Europe, signing digitally is not legally binding. I’m sure this will be different for different jurisdictions. This is completely wrong, you are 100% bound by a contract you signed with Preview.app. Does that mean it’s a good practice? No. > it’s not a good practice and there’s no guarantee it will be accepted on its own. See, this is completely different from your original claim. I’m not sure why you are continuing with this bullshit, I think we both know that your original comment was incorrect.