Nice article! One small typo: > It can be seen that all three sensors correlate very well but that the Vindriktning only shows about 65% of the PM2.5 values of

Nice article! One small typo: > It can be seen that all three sensors correlate very well but that the Vindriktning only shows about 65% of the PM2.5 values of the other two sensors and thus seems to considerably understate the air quality. I think here you mean "overstate the air quality" right? Or "understate the air pollution"