2 ms·
>Those "unfree licenses" are the reason you're not forced to use Windows on desktops/laptops/phones/servers/toasters/supercomputers (it does none of these thing
by nix23 5y ago
>Those "unfree licenses" are the reason you're not forced to use Windows on desktops/laptops/phones/servers/toasters/supercomputers (it does none of these things well even now, imagine the world we would have if it didn't have any competition at all).
BS, i use FreeBSD and no one ever forced me to use Windows, Linux on the Desktop does everything right?
>GPL puts the user's freedom first.
No it's free promotion for the FSF
>scratch like they do in SerenityOS
Yes and they chose a good license (BSD2)
- fsflover 5y ago> No it's free promotion for the FSF They deserve the promotion, because they created useful software. > BS, i use FreeBSD and no one ever forced me to use Windows At some point, Windows was everywhere, you couldn't hide from it. Now, Linux provides a strong competition, forcing even Microsoft to include it into Windows. BSD, instead, served as free labor for Apple, who created a walled garden for users. What exactly do you want to do with the code that GPL prevents you from?