3 ms·
Why would I look at just their trading revenue? The fine was levied against the entire company, not just their trading subsidiary. >settling charges against J
by plebianRube 5y ago
Why would I look at just their trading revenue?
The fine was levied against the entire company, not just their trading subsidiary.
>settling charges against JPMorgan Chase & Company (JPMC & Co.) and its subsidiaries, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS) (collectively, JPM)
- swsieber 5y agoBecause if these are trading actions that lead to these fines then a rational actor might decide against taking then in the future lest trading become a net negative.
- gruez 5y ago> Why would I look at just their trading revenue? Why should you? Suppose you did a bad. Let's it was a side hustle where you took refurbished ipads and resold them as brand-new ipads. Over the past year you made $2000 in profit from doing so. The cops caught you doing it and fined you $10k. That sounds like a pretty serious penalty. However, you're also a bay area software engineer making $400k total comp, so $10k is a drop in the bucket. Should they fine you $200k instead, just because you happen to be a software engineer?
- __del__ 5y ago> Should they fine you $200k instead Yes, the fines should be punitive, not proportional to the damage.